Many of you will remember the movie several years ago entitled, "Sleeping With The Enemy". As I recall a woman was in an abusive situation that was so bad that she actually faked her death in order to get out of the situation. Until that occurred she was sleeping with the enemy.
There is scarcely a day passing that I do not hear a remark about the assault or the war on Christianity. Some of the younger generations may not see it as vividly as older folks. But the attacks are there just the same. Look at all of the government buildings that are over a 100 years old and you will see numerous biblical quotes and Christian expressions written in stone. Today there are attempts to remove any vestige of Christian influence.
Let me quickly state that in my mind the problem is not with the enemy, the problem is that we have gone asleep as churches and as Christians. We have literally been sleeping with the enemy.
Matthew tells the story of the men who were overseeing a wheat field for a landowner and states, While they slept the enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat. Several years ago in the comic strip, Pogo, the little possum said, "We have found the enemy and it is us.
And while Christians slept, prayer has been removed from our public schools, the life of the unborn has been taken. Go figure a nation that will cry, "Save the owl, kill the baby." We have been lulled to sleep by mother fashion and father political correctness.
Never forget, "Righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people."
On the night that Jesus was seized and taken for trial, Jesus took the disciples to the Garden and then took Peter, James and John a little farther. He said watch you hear while I go and pray. When he returned they were asleep. He asked them "Could you not watch with me one hour." He went back to pray and upon returning he found them asleep again. This time he did not wake them up. I wonder how many times he has found us asleep.
Paul said, "It is high time to awake out of sleep for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed."
Charles Jones - copyright material
Monday, October 26, 2015
Friday, October 23, 2015
A Crack in the Foundation
Often you will hear someone make a statement about the reason that we are in the mess that we are in. There are legions of reasons why the situation has become desperate. In our own country, which Winston Churchill once called, "The land of the free and the home of the brave", which has now become the land of the spree and the home of the rave, it would take pages just to list the many reasons we are where we are.
We hear constantly about the education crisis in our country and the deplorable condition of the number of students that are dropping out of school or finishing without being able to go to college with out remedial work. I think you can lay many of our problems upon the breakup of the family. Oh, it sounded good when a certain presidential candidate said years ago, "It takes a village to raise a child." But, the truth of the matter is, it only takes a loving caring family to raise a child. A village can't do the job for the family. Oh, our government wants to do the job; make the decisions; provide the means of survival, etc; but it takes a family to raise a child. It will be a rare situation that finds a child who will be able to succeed when placed in an environment that from all practical thinking, is doomed to failure.
One recent statistic showed that 47% of the children are living in a home in which one or both parents are not present. Many of these children are being raised by elderly grandparents, often living on a fixed income and many of them unable to stand up to the task of raising small children.
May God help us to see the need of couples entering into marriage be as committed to completing the task and providing all that is necessary that their children will have the opportunity to survive in today's world.
We hear constantly about the education crisis in our country and the deplorable condition of the number of students that are dropping out of school or finishing without being able to go to college with out remedial work. I think you can lay many of our problems upon the breakup of the family. Oh, it sounded good when a certain presidential candidate said years ago, "It takes a village to raise a child." But, the truth of the matter is, it only takes a loving caring family to raise a child. A village can't do the job for the family. Oh, our government wants to do the job; make the decisions; provide the means of survival, etc; but it takes a family to raise a child. It will be a rare situation that finds a child who will be able to succeed when placed in an environment that from all practical thinking, is doomed to failure.
One recent statistic showed that 47% of the children are living in a home in which one or both parents are not present. Many of these children are being raised by elderly grandparents, often living on a fixed income and many of them unable to stand up to the task of raising small children.
May God help us to see the need of couples entering into marriage be as committed to completing the task and providing all that is necessary that their children will have the opportunity to survive in today's world.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
A Rose by Any Other Name
It sounds so wonderful, "a rose by any other name would smell so sweet". It would be a peculiar type person who would not agree with that statement. However, today I wish to take a different statement that has been around for many years and elaborate upon it.
The story has been repeated many times as an object lesson. A man was walking up in the mountains and had reached the level above what is called tree level. It was extremely cold at this high altitude. He came across a rattlesnake that was almost dead from the cold. The rattlesnake asked the man to take him back down where it was warmer. The man responded that he was afraid of the rattlesnake because he knew they would bite. The rattlesnake promised not to bite the man. So the man picked up the snake, placed the snake inside his coat for warmth and started back down the mountain for warmer weather. Upon reaching the warmer weather, the snake suddenly bit the man. The man said to the snake, "You promised that you would not bite me." The snake replied, "You knew what I was when you picked me up."
I cannot believe that the American people are so blind in their acceptance of the Muslim people as to ignore what they have stood for all of these years; what they do in every country that they control; what the basic concept of their ideology toward others that do not belong to their faith is (convert or die); and yet any criticism of them is categorized as hate.
Perhaps it is not the American people who are blind. I think that the problem is the leaders of our country who would destroy our country to try to satisfy a blind "politically correctness." Most of them do it ignorantly, however there are a few, the president number one, who has never tried to hide his concern and fondness for the Muslim religion. Remember, he said in effect I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
Some would like to label thoughts as I have mentioned as being Islamophobia. Never! I do not fear the rattlesnake. I will never be bitten by a rattlesnake that I can see. It is the one that I cannot see that I fear. I do not fear the Muslims, but I have no intention of being a party to those who would turn our country into what the country looked like which they left, they did not like enough to stay there. Now they would change our culture and our laws to be what they left behind.
A rose by any other name still would smell just as sweet. And they danger of the Muslim religion overseas is still just as dangerous over here.
The story has been repeated many times as an object lesson. A man was walking up in the mountains and had reached the level above what is called tree level. It was extremely cold at this high altitude. He came across a rattlesnake that was almost dead from the cold. The rattlesnake asked the man to take him back down where it was warmer. The man responded that he was afraid of the rattlesnake because he knew they would bite. The rattlesnake promised not to bite the man. So the man picked up the snake, placed the snake inside his coat for warmth and started back down the mountain for warmer weather. Upon reaching the warmer weather, the snake suddenly bit the man. The man said to the snake, "You promised that you would not bite me." The snake replied, "You knew what I was when you picked me up."
I cannot believe that the American people are so blind in their acceptance of the Muslim people as to ignore what they have stood for all of these years; what they do in every country that they control; what the basic concept of their ideology toward others that do not belong to their faith is (convert or die); and yet any criticism of them is categorized as hate.
Perhaps it is not the American people who are blind. I think that the problem is the leaders of our country who would destroy our country to try to satisfy a blind "politically correctness." Most of them do it ignorantly, however there are a few, the president number one, who has never tried to hide his concern and fondness for the Muslim religion. Remember, he said in effect I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
Some would like to label thoughts as I have mentioned as being Islamophobia. Never! I do not fear the rattlesnake. I will never be bitten by a rattlesnake that I can see. It is the one that I cannot see that I fear. I do not fear the Muslims, but I have no intention of being a party to those who would turn our country into what the country looked like which they left, they did not like enough to stay there. Now they would change our culture and our laws to be what they left behind.
A rose by any other name still would smell just as sweet. And they danger of the Muslim religion overseas is still just as dangerous over here.
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist
I have borrowed for the topic today the title of a book by: Norman Geisler, Frank Turek and David Limbaugh: I don't have enough faith to be an atheist. That thought should prod our attention to a whole new concept of thinking. We automatically believe that those who are involved in religion of necessity must have faith in that which they believe. I suggest to you that the atheist also has to have faith in what he believes. He must have faith that what the Christian is saying is wrong. There is no way that he can prove that they are wrong. Christians should never try to prove to others beyond the shadow of doubt that what they believe is true. You see, a man cannot come into a right relationship with God without faith. Without faith it is impossible to please God. That being said, I just don't have enough faith to be an atheist.
Let us think along this line a little farther. Webster defines religion as being an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies and rules used to worship a god or group of gods. (notice the small g in both cases.) Webster farther defines religion as being: An interest, a belief or an activity that is very important to a person or group. Dictionary.com defines religion as: a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects.
Going along with the wider definition of religion I would say that atheism is a religion. Oh, you say, they don't believe there is a god. That is just one of the negative concepts of their religion that they do not believe in God. All religions have specific things that they do not believe in as well as that which they do believe. I will leave it up to the atheist to state what things he believes in.
Now here we find the atheist wanting the government to make a law favoring their religion over other religions when they ask for the ten commandments to be removed, no prayer in public places and the removal of such statements as, "In God we Trust". Surely, the government will cease trying to appease the Atheist Religion in their conquest to enforce their doctrinal beliefs.
Monday, April 28, 2014
Putting a New Slant on an Old View
There are a few concepts that I would like to consider today from a totally different perspective than that which is normal. Albert Einstein once challenged a professor on three separate concepts that would be of value for us to consider today. By no means are these thoughts original with me but credit goes total and completely to Mr. Einstein.
Mr. Einstein challenged his professor by making the statement that there was no such thing as darkness. He suggested that darkness only existed as an absence of light. You can have bright light, dim light, or even brilliant light but when you had no light all that was left was darkness. He made the same argument about heat and cold. There is no actual thing or even a measuring scale for what we call cold. When you consider heat you can easily imagine all of the varying degrees of heat. You can have high heat, low heat, warm heat, extreme heat, etch. but when you have no heat you have cold. We measure heat by British thermal units (btu's) or degrees. You can even go down to a point of -458 degrees F. That is where all movement of molecules cease, the lower range of heat. Why can it get no colder, because there is no more heat to be lost.
Of particular interest to me, especially coming from Mr. Einstein, was his discussion of evil. When he was confronted with the statement that God created evil therefore God must be evil, he countered with the argument that evil did not exist by itself; that evil was not present as an entity unto itself. He argued that what we see of evil in this world, is not that which was the design of God but what was left in the absence of God. Which is another way of presenting that God is love, but when his love is rejected what you have left is the wrath of God. It is as simple as flipping a coin--you get heads or tails. When you deal with God you get--His wrath or His love. The choice is up to the individual.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
It's Friday Now, But Sunday is Coming
The title, It's Friday Now, But Sunday Is Coming, is a sermon that has been attributed to different preachers down through the years. I would like to think it may have been preached first by Dr. S. M. Lockridge, one of the greatest black preachers I have ever had the blessing of hearing. The sermon is regularly preached on Palm Sunday and describes all of the events that happened on the day Jesus was crucified.
The impact of the sermon is so dramatic in that it contrasts what happened on that day with what happened on the following Sunday. It's Friday now, Satan is in control, but Sunday is coming. It should serve as a warning to everyone who is living their life without God, that things may seem great today, but there is a payday coming. At the same time those who may be struggling with problems in their life and have a strong faith in God. It's Friday now, but Sunday is coming. Lift up your heads for your redemption draweth nigh.
The impact of the sermon is so dramatic in that it contrasts what happened on that day with what happened on the following Sunday. It's Friday now, Satan is in control, but Sunday is coming. It should serve as a warning to everyone who is living their life without God, that things may seem great today, but there is a payday coming. At the same time those who may be struggling with problems in their life and have a strong faith in God. It's Friday now, but Sunday is coming. Lift up your heads for your redemption draweth nigh.
Sunday, December 22, 2013
A Christmas Question--Is It So?
A Christmas Question
Is it so?
Isaiah 9:6
For unto us a child is born, unto
us a son is given: and the government shall be upon
his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The
mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Introduction: Hundreds of years before Mary placed the baby
Jesus into the manger, Isaiah foretold the fact that a child was going to be
born and a son was going to be given. He
farther said that the mother would be a virgin when this occurred. There were a lot of people who had their
normal night interrupted by the strange goings on that night. I would not be surprised that somewhere a
blind man that night dreamed that he could see, a deaf man dreamed he could
hear, a cripple man dreamed that he could walk and perhaps even some old bones
inside a tomb near Jerusalem stirred slightly within the grave.
This same Jesus that caused such a
disturbance over two thousand years ago is still disturbing the hearts of men
and women around the world. I would hope
this morning that he might in some way cause a slight disturbance in your life
and lifestyle that would prompt you to do more for His cause.
My question for today, Is it so? Is no
questioning whether or not Jesus was actually born. As far as I am concerned that is a settled
fact. When you consider that most of the
nations of the world use a calendar that in essence says every time they write
a document and date it, they are dated it—In the Year of our Lord.
Ask a devout Jew today if Jesus, the
Messiah came and he will say no. Ask a
Muslim if he came and he would say, he came but not as a Saviour. The Gnostic's said he came but was all man and
some of them said no he came but he was still all God. Ask the atheist today and he will say he did
not come.
My question for you, Is it so that he was
born unto you. To an unbeliever the
birth of a baby over two thousand years ago in a town so small there was no
hospital and to such insignificant parents that there was no place for them to
have a place for him to be born, except a stable, is completely insignificant. But if the child was born unto you, it
makes a world of difference. The fact
that Jesus was born into an earthly family enables you that by putting your
faith in Him, you can be born into a heavenly family.
The second part of Isaiah’s statement that
deserves us seeking for an answer is that a son is given.. John 3:16 states so eloquently and yet so
simply, For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that
whosoever believeth on him shall have everlasting life. Again John said, He came unto his own but his
own received him not, but as many as received him gave he power to become the
sons of God.
Sometimes I think you can expound upon
that verse and translate “his own” in several ways. He came unto his own creation and his own
creation received him not. The creator
was rejected by the creation. He came
unto his own beloved people and his own people received him not. The Messiah is rejected by his own special
people. He also came unto those that he
would choose and they received him not.
You see when there is a giving of gifts
there must be an acceptance of gifts.
The Christmas question is was he given unto you. He was not given unto you unless you have accepted
that gift as being your very one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)